iam D., "Birth Order and Its Sequelae," Science, January 7,
vnne, "Intelligence and Family Size," Psychol Bui, May 1956.
Dorothea A., "Language Development in Children," Manual Psychology, L. Carmichael, ed. New York: John Wiley &
16. pp. 558-559.
i. A., "Social Status and Intelligence," Genetic Psychol Mono-
'ol. 49, 1954. pp. 141-186.
, "The Environment and Mental Development," Manual of
vchology. L. Carmichael, ed. New York: John Wiley & Sons,
"Language and Non-Verbal Test Performance of Racial Groups
lulu before and after a Fourteen-Year Interval," / Genetic
Vol. 26. pp. 51-93.
. M., Growth at Adolescence. Oxford: BlackwelTs 2nd ed.,
, M., "Galtonian Eugenics and the Study of Growth," Eugen tember 1966. pp. 127-128.
A.., "Intelligence, Physique, and Family Size." Brit J Prev Soc tober 1962. pp. 165-173.
, Julian, "Family Size, Intelligence Score, and Social Class," on Studies, June 1947. pp. 165-176.
j, Nevin S., and John E. Gordon, eds., Malnutrition, Learning ivior. Cambridge: M.I.T. Press, 1968. pp. 353-354. obert Gray, and Lytt I. Gardner, Growth Failure in Maternal ion. St. Louis: C. C. Thomas, 1963.
S., "The Concept of Maternal Deprivation: a Review of Re-Deprivation of Maternal Care; a Reassessment of Its Effects. lealth Organization Public Health Papers, Vol. 14. Geneva, p.75-95.
. B., and H. A. Kraut, "Work and Nutrition," World Review of n and Dietetics, G. H. Bourne, ed. New York: Hafner Pub. Co., ol. III.
eel, Biology of Human Starvation. Minneapolis: Univ. Minne-ss, 1950.
)lin, Population Growth and Land Use. London: Macmillan, p. 123-129.
,ester R., Man, Land and Food. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Dept. of :ure, Economic Research Service, Regional Analysis Division, p. 36, 142-143.
:>nal Labor Organization, "The World's Working Population, emographic Aspects," p. 173.
, Frederick H., and Charles A. Myers, Education, Manpower, onomic Growth, Strategies of Human Resource-Development. >rk: McGraw-Hill, 1964. p. 19.een inputs and outputs is no longer tenable once one gives primary importance to nontraditional inputs. What is new is the rather persuasive evidence that the nontraditional inputs are usually more significant than the traditional ones, and hence the relations between population growth and nontraditional inputs should in most cases become central to the analysis of the "population-resources" problem.